M. TAHIR versus STATE
Section 392 Definition of Evidence The prosecutor filed the evidence in the examination with the complainant's chief and other prosecution witnesses, but his cross-examination was safe and he was not presented to the trial court for the purpose of cross-examination, it said. The prosecution's testimony was inconsistent. When the complainant has made a serious statement as to the evidence of the police officer that they do not want to pursue their case, their evidence cannot be considered by the trial court while the prosecution has been able to confirm the evidence directly. Was unsuccessful. Can't be convicted of a crime; in those cases the conviction by the trial court was set aside because the prosecutor failed, accused failed to present any concrete evidence against the accused. Circumstances r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Quaidabad lawyer