Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

M. TAHIR versus STATE


Section 392 Definition of Evidence The prosecutor filed the evidence in the examination with the complainant's chief and other prosecution witnesses, but his cross-examination was safe and he was not presented to the trial court for the purpose of cross-examination, it said. The prosecution's testimony was inconsistent. When the complainant has made a serious statement as to the evidence of the police officer that they do not want to pursue their case, their evidence cannot be considered by the trial court while the prosecution has been able to confirm the evidence directly. Was unsuccessful. Can't be convicted of a crime; in those cases the conviction by the trial court was set aside because the prosecutor failed, accused failed to present any concrete evidence against the accused. Circumstances r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.