MST. FAZEELAT BIBI versus STATE
Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6/9 and 2 (d) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 4 Guarantee, FIR Memorandum Restoration and Chemical Inspector The report did not specify whether the substance allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused was of the herbaceous flower or blooming peaks, about whether the peaks Seeds and leaves were excluded if not accompanied or whether they were recovered from the seized substance of Section 2 (d) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, therefore not initially fulfilled. Or went so as to attract the provisions of the aforesaid act against the accused, which is 10kg from its possession, the prohibition (enforcement head) order came under the scope of Article 4 of 1979, which lasted for more than two years. The convicted \ RI suspect was a woman and did nothing for her.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Sangla Hill lawyer
