Find a Lawyer

JAVED IQBAL versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, CIRCLE LAHORE

A. XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), 5 116 application, for the approval of interim relief Order filed for injunction The plaintiff of the college applied for a grant of interim relief with the suit on the premises of the shop along with the suit of the suit, which was rejected by the court as the plaintiff's legal position that Was in agreement under the agreement which allowed the premises to be leased to the bookstore. For a period of one year on monthly rent, the plaintiff's view was that he should be held liable under section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the plaintiff further submitted in the lease agreement. The unlawful notice of lease closure was illegal in the custody of the authorities, noting that the alleged contract was not a lease, but rather an agreement to provide services to the college for the remainder of the college and its term, which was limited to one year in particular. Was expired, the authorities denied that they had received any rent from the plaintiff for post-expiration, the money allegedly deposited by the plaintiff to the authorities - without permission, without authorization. The bank account or the consent of the college could not guarantee the benefit of the plaintiff; the rent was not approved under the circumstances under section 116 of the Transferred Property Act, 1882. That's it, and neither of the authorities has given consent to the plaintiff to continue. In the possession of the contracted premises, the plaintiff did not record any receipt from the authority to show that the rent had been received and it was admitted that the bank account consistently immigration advocates phone number from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer