SHAHID UMER versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI
Section 3 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Sections 12 (2) and 96 (3) of the High Court of Appeal, had earlier filed two cases in relation to the present appeal and the subsequent case. Both said that the suit was compromised. Are dealt by. The appellant subsequently filed two separate appeals challenging the agreement's order, which he requested with the appellant's permission to file a fresh case, alleging that the agreement was fraudulent and / or false. The statement was made, if so, would have been compromised. Section 12 (2), both of the suit's orders should have been attacked by the petitioners under CPC, because the compromise could not be in accordance with the CPC order of the court in view of the provisions of section 9 (3). , Which did not suit him. The law could not bring a party to the right to sue or institute proceedings which he was not legally entitled to
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Sanghar lawyer
