Find a Lawyer

HAJAT MANSHA versus STATE

Sections 242424 and 3 353 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 656565), section 13 (d) evidence was doubtful in nature, the evidence available on record was not sufficient to conclude that the accused was against him. The offense can be punished. The incident occurred at 0500 hours inside the street where a large number of people were present on the spot, but no attempt was made by the police to take an independent witness to establish the alleged encounter, but allegedly with his pistol. There was a shooting, but no one. An injured policeman, who allegedly apprehended the suspect and searched him, was not presented by Prosecutor Pistol, allegedly recovered from the shalwar layers of the accused, was not sealed on the spot. And the empty pistol was seized at the police station trial court. The prosecution's version of the accused was admitted, but the co-defendants did not agree against the accused as the trial court's finding was not based on sound evidence. E-trial court's moral opinion could not form the basis of the crime and it was not safe to rely on the complainant's testimony without independent source evidence 34 342 The accused's statement was not recorded in accordance with CCP law. The date and time of the arrest were presented to the accused and the alleged encounter court did not follow the procedure provided under the law when the law provides for the procedure to be performed in a particular way. Should be done in a manner and not in any other way, the report was delayed, but the prosecution has no The explanation could not be revealed, so much so how to become a advocate from Samma Satta lawyer