Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASEEN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Testimony of Evidence Benefits of Suspicion The matter of the dark hours of the night contradicts the statements of witnesses regarding the motive. , Recovered from the scene, it was sent to the firearm specialist, but no information of the firearm expert is available on record. The recovery does not support the ocular account presented by both eye witnesses, both witnesses to each other and The detainees were related and the witnesses had no independent support available by any means, Although he was armed with a dagger about his motive or recovery co-accused, it did not cause any overt action and did not hurt any of the accused and the appeal of the co-accused was accepted and sentenced. The reasonable sentence recorded by the trial court against them was set aside, there was no independent endorsement on the statements of the late relatives of the deceased. The accused had the benefit of the doubt and his appeal was accepted in the circumstances and the trial court upheld the sentence or sentence against the accused. criminal advocate from Hasilpur lawyer