Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus STATE

Cross-version, charged with aggression by sections 497 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 324, 337 L (ii), 337F (ii), F (v), 148 and 149 guarantees. Further inquiries of the case against each other is the question of which version was correct, which cannot be determined at the bail-out stage without recording the evidence even though Section 302, PC, PC was also included, But the two accused did not cause any injury to the victim. The liability of the accused is also open to inquiry to the extent of section 2302 or P, 4, P, C, and under section 77L L (ii), offense is guaranteed under PPC, while section 777F ( iii) and under (v) the offenses; PPC 49 497, CRPC did not fall under the prohibited clause; the charges against the opposition party were also made under section 7497, sections 7337 of the CCPC: A (i) and 337. L (ii) did not constitute any offense under the Prohibited Clause. The PPCs were guaranteed and the injuries attributable to the accused were also open in the light of the Medical Board's subsequent report, suspending them for their realism under Section 242424, PP. As it was open, recording of such evidence cannot be deemed necessary at the C-bail-out stage. In both cases, the accused was admitted on bail in order to attract his constituents. famous high court advocate from Alipur lawyer