Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MEHMOOD versus STATE

Section 497 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Guarantee, Complaint and FIR Grant, shows that 60 rupees in each bag containing base number was recovered from the possession of the accused. When he was, driving, but 17 173, in a report made under CR PC, it has been reported that 50 rupees has been recovered from each bag, counsel for the council cannot reconcile such discrimination. Yes, possession of alcohol will attract the provisions of Article 4 of my Prohibition (Order, 197.9, which was a matter of guaranteed prosecution, if it is taken to the extreme and considered a case of alcohol transportation). Yes. Nevertheless, under the purpose of selling a large quantity of alcohol, it would attract Article 3 of the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979, which also did not fall under the Prohibition Clause of Section 497, C.R.P. C was guaranteed and denied. The suspect stayed behind the prison for about 5/2 months and was the last non-convict. The suspect may have been used by another person involved in the business of making and selling liquor. The accused was admitted. Bail in circumstances \ r \ n advocates from Phool nagar lawyer