Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Definitions of section 2302 (b) and 2) evidence (c) of evidence cannot be used as a piece of evidence to reduce the delayed FIR, despite the fact that the incident occurred in a densely populated area. None were included in the investigation nor were the defendants failed to prove the prosecution's version. The witness was not credible and was not trusted. The accused, upon seeing his real sister, had requested to kill the deceased under sudden provocation. During the odd hours of the night, the prosecution had established its intention as a compromise with the deceased, that the suspect was suspected of having an illicit relationship with the victim's sister and that both accused were killed on the night of the incident. Who had been charged. The acquittal of the first version of the accused before his acquittal over the murder of his sister on the basis of compromise was the same as the slitting officer had taken during his trial, as he had taken through the trial, the victim's vaginal swab. Was found guilty of mini-medical evidence and the circumstances of the case fully supported the defense plea case against the accused, none of them being convicted as a result of section 302 (b), Was changed from PPC to section 302 (c), and his death sentence was limited to seven years while payment of conditions was made. The recipe was set aside. Not an innocent drum who got involved in an unprovoked. law firms from Mingora lawyer