Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MALIK TANVEER AHMAD BHUTTA versus STATE


Section 324 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 4 (T) and 173 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Evidence Petition Investigating Officer's Interpretative Opinion, In no case can police officers be considered legal evidence, Under the scheme of law, there was no need to detect the crime or innocence of the culprits, only to be charged or detained by the accused under Section 4 (l), Cr. According to the evidence needed to be collected. The PC report was submitted under Section 173 CCPC, the police had objected to maintaining the constitutional petition without any legal basis, there was no continuity, or trial. The trial court's case will be considered in this regard. The trial court will not be affected by the baseless opinion of the investigating officers, irrespective of the irregularities during the investigation by the police to produce legal evidence against the accused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.