Find a Lawyer

MIAN MAQBOOL AHMAD versus MALIK MUHAMMAD IJAZ

O IX, R 13, O XXXVII, Rr 2 & 3 Professional note-based retaliation proceedings against the deceased defendant's legal representative, the trial court accepted by the trial court under bank security or cash deposit did it. The record of the justification for the amount of money has revealed that the leave to appeal / defend for the trial was actually granted at the request of the defendant, which would provide for a guaranteed bail and he ordered And appellants stepped in their foreboding shoes. And may not be required to submit bank security or cash by reviewing the first successful order of delivery of the guarantee bond through the original defendant, which was not the execution of the promise note / receipt and the allegedly advanced amount. Were not used. The burden of depositing cash in the suit amounted to the burden, while the original defendant was discharged in defense of the suit subject to fur only by a High Court, forcing the bond to be guaranteed in accordance with the rules. , Allowed the application to set aside the previous order, as it had already been allowed by the trial court but accepted the appeal without condition. advocates from Mian Walli lawyer