Find a Lawyer

MIRZA KHAN versus SECRETARY, SERVICES AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, QUETTA

The declaration of suit for Articles 9 and 42 was closed in 1974 with the suit for declaration and the avoidance award in which the mill was presenting the plaintiff and in 1986 it was stated that the mill and the colony were to be sent to the department. The treasury was replaced by a planter and the colony's houses and residences were allotted bungalows, but the plaintiff was deprived of such convenience and was instead deported forcibly, though he was a regular plaintiff. Was paying rent from, he claimed that upon his request, the house in question was allotted for a signal, but one The man managed to get 111. In 1991, the land under his name was allotted and in the case filed against him, it was stated that the allotment was dismissed and the appeal was also dismissed by the appellate court, before the appellate court in question asked the plaintiff. Was allocated to the government which did not have the power to make allotments under the government. The Servants Benevolent Fund Ordinance, 1960 and the rules made there under both courts, were correct under the circumstances serving as a supervisor in the mill defying the claimant's claim, but for a bungalow built on 8,000 square feet. Fighting under which he had no verified jurisdiction, he could not be used in favor of the plaintiff as it would be his equivalent. Permanently illegal \ r \ n online advocate from Jacobabad lawyer