Find a Lawyer

ZAREENA BEGUM versus HAQ NAWAZ

Section 11 of the Contract42 Contract Act (IX of 1872,) was allegedly affirmed by the claimant for the sale of the suit in its minority, so the sale was thus void. Because its evidence was certified by the suit authority on 25 8 1980. When the plaintiff claimed to be 12 years old, the school leaving certificate was presented in evidence that the plaintiff's date of birth was 12 1 1968, and the marriage was signed on 28 May 1989 and the marriage record was 18 years. There was no proof of this. The valid sale of the plaintiff by the plaintiff to confirm or confirm a reasonable change was minor when the suit mutation was entered / affirmed on 25 8 1980 when the suit was ordered under the circumstances. jobs for advocates from Makran lawyer