YASIR versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 386 bail, further investigation grant no mention of the date of the incident was mentioned in the FIR while the complainant sought to pay the ransom amount, There was no reason or background. On the one hand it was mentioned by the complainant that on the one hand, according to the complainant some unknown persons were demanding ransom while hiding their identity, but receiving the money, the accused made no attempt to hide his identity, or Their faces allegedly made fun of them, certainly needing further investigation by the trial court, allegedly demanding that the ransom money was not seized by the investigator, and that the investigators had seized Sims of these mobile phones. He was also unable to take possession of the premises where unknown persons demanded ransom from the complainant's case. Further inquiry into the scope of section 497 (2), CR PC, in the circumstances, was made in favor of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Gilgit lawyer
