Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH D.O(R), SIALKOT

The plaintiff of the switch lands for section 42 and 54 homeless persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), section 10 civil procedure code (V8 1908), O XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 suit declarations and injunctions Has claimed to buy land from. Therefore, its cancellation by the authority and further exchange in favor of the defendant was illegal in the possession of the plaintiff's request for approval of the interim order in the event the plaintiff's request was that the authority Such an order was passed in compliance with the decision of the Court. The Chief Settlement Commissioner had legally stopped the allotment of forest land by the trial court and the appellate court. If the allotment in favor of the plaintiff's predecessor falls into the trap of such a decision, o [the Supreme Court will require the determination of some factual aspect. Whether the land is legally acquired for the forest or it is legally declared or protected / protected for forest impacts, such order by the Chief Settlement Commissioner will be determined during the trial when the plaintiff The land was to be occupied, the injunction was denied in the event of irreparable damage, the balance of the facility was in favor of the plaintiff The High Court, rejecting the uncontested order, directed that the parties' suit decide r status. will maintain the status quo until the decision of n divorce advocates from Digri lawyer