STATE versus MUHAMMAD AZAM
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), 5 324 bail, 9 The magistrate's cancellation granted the usual order and the accused's bail was granted by the magistrate stating that no recovery was made from the accused. Gone wrong, as a pistol. The injured victim, who was a star witness at the time of his arrest, had fully involved the accused in his statement under Section 161, CRPC, but the magistrate went on record to mention this. Did not bother that the accused was declared an accused. , But the magistrate failed to know when the accused was arrested and whether any proceedings were initiated under Section 87/88, CCPC, before the accused was presented to the court ten months after the incident. And his recovery had no effect. But there was no basis for granting a bail in a mere submission of invoices, death sentences, life imprisonment or a bail granted to the accused on a ten-year magistrate's non-bailable basis. The bail order, approved by the magistrate available on record, was withdrawn under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Khangarh lawyer