Find a Lawyer

ABDULAH JAN versus STATE

Section 561A, 249A & 265's Panel Code (XLV of 1860), S \ 420, 466, 468 and 471 Corruption Act (II of 1947), petitioner action on termination of section 5 (2) proceedings. The trial against him demanded to be terminated before the court on the ground that the matter was civil in nature, the criminal proceedings were bound to be canceled, the petitioners resisted on the ground that the petitioner had sought The crime committed was a scheduled offense, which was heard by a special judge, Anti-Corruption. The question which required determination in this case was whether the complaint was to be lodged by the collector's court under Section 195 (a), CCP or the complainant was filed before the Special Special Court Anti-Corruption. The same can be filed against. Whether the trial court could take action on the matter itself, to address such questions, the applicant should have filed an application with the trial court under section 265K, CRPC generally pursuing high court section 555 The proceedings under A do not invalidate the proceedings, unless the trial court uses it. 24 249 A or 265 K, powers were dismissed under CR PC, the same type of plea barred by the proceedings, however, Section 265 K could pass the trial court under CR PC, said r \ n property advocates from Ghazi lawyer