Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL PAINT HOUSE THROUGH M. MAZHAR-UL-HASSAN & COMPANY, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of the Office of Section A 33 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000X of XXV), Section 2 (3) and 22 Release of seized goods and the release of forced goods by Revenue for posting and transfer The answer is no. In the office premises, the goods / records were deposited in the wrong place and the collector was doing his best to find the goods that would be returned soon, this incident was true after a long period of seven years and all At the end of the proceedings, the goods / records were intensified yet not returned which spoke of the department officials' insensitivity, negligence and apathy when the goods were forwarded, with the relevant officials Had the duty to ensure his safe custody and to ensure safe return to the complainant at the end. Action even if moving from one place to another, it will not relinquish the responsibility of securing relevant officers. The degree of liability of the goods will be high in such cases as additional care will be required to ensure that the taxpayer-related goods / records are not lost or lost, if transferred to the officers, So it is imperative for the officers to properly charge their successors, including the calculation of the appropriate equipment, carelessness, negligence in discharging the responsibilities and responsibilities of the officers related to the misplacement and / or loss of defective goods. Eligible and ineligible, which equates to a federal tax rate. The Ombudsman recommended that the item to be traced to the complainant within 3 days of the order. ?? family advocate from Sangote lawyer