Find a Lawyer

MUREED ABBAS versus STATE

Section 302 (h) Definition of evidence Punishment, mitigating circumstance The prosecution allegedly failed to establish a specific motive in the incident, the ocular testimony of the prosecution witnesses was corroborated by the medical evidence, it was alleged Who recognized all the important aspects of the incident. The weapons were fired due to the attack by the dead, but said the request was not supported and supported by the medical evidence and did not prove the ocular testimony and other evidence available at the admission of the accused, Beyond any doubt. The suspect was hit by a weapon and sent to the ballistic expert, who received a report from the prosecutor, who, in the circumstances, has proven the recovery, in particular, The prosecutor alleged that the incident had occurred. Prior to the incident, however, it did not prove that the incident that occurred suddenly without any plan or plan was a mitigating circumstance where the accused could be less punished. This was not the case where the accused was sentenced to extreme death. Granted, the trial court was also not justified in awarding a fine of Rs 200, 000 to the accused. The provisions of section 2302 (b), PPC did not impose such conviction. immigration advocates email from Skardu lawyer