Find a Lawyer

PAK PERSIAN CARPETS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 3636, & 73 & A 45A Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V, section 2 ()) with the creation of tax liabilities in respect of tax collection and return of income tax The tax and penalties for the increase were issued on the basis of the ambiguous show cause notice, without the fulfillment of the terms of the show cause notice, as it did not provide the basis for the proposed action or the reasons. The accuracy officer hurriedly concluded that the complainant was guilty of not giving his independent inquiries, on the object raised by the complainant, without supporting any conclusions reached, which was presented by the complainant. The request should have been reviewed, the facts and figures should have been examined and the reasons for rejecting the complainant's point of view. The adjusting officer had failed to approve the order in a detailed and reasonable manner. This happened as the matters involved by the Adjudicating Officer Prosecution were relied upon and the complainant's arguments were ignored, the order was actually a violation of the principles of sketching, one-sided, illicit, arbitrary and natural justice. All of which, in the sense of section 2 (3) of the establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, `2000, the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Revenue Division re-order a competent authority in order 1. Direct the release as it relates to the allegations. (1 and 2) and after providing the opportunity for a complaint to be heard, reconsider the charges in accordance with the provisions of the law. \ R \ n top advocate from Kakul lawyer