GHULAM FATIMA versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
The applicants of Articles 14, 17 and 20 of the Arbitration Agreement have claimed that the matter has been resolved through arbitration between the parties after the filing of the case, therefore, the award should be ruled by the court, the respondents referred the matter to arbitration. Refused, the trial court granted the request and the award was made as a rule of the court, the appellate court allowed the appeal, and the judgment and decree passed by the trial court set aside and Any alleged arbitration or award in connection with a case without the possession of the case or the consent of the court, The Court refused to take any exception in the appellate court's finding that the award given by the applicant had no legal effect, so the court's decision could not be made by the appellate court in which a material bail was made. The regulator did not exist. The amendment was denied by the High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction to guarantee interference with the jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Daud Khel lawyer