Find a Lawyer

ATTA-UR-REHMAN versus FAZAL AHMED

Section Ban42 Bankers Books Proof of the Act (XVIII of 1891), Sections 2 (8) and 4 Conventions of Evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 72 and 79 Articles of the Anonymous Transaction Statement of Proof of Accounts The plaintiff and the plaintiff were real brothers that the plaintiff Claimed the case over. The property in which it was purchased from the funds provided by his father was opposed by the defendant on the request that he purchased the property in his name against the registered sale deed plaintiff and A letter written by the dependent authorities and a statement of the accounts issued. In connection with the bank's account of the parties to the bank, both the courts respectively dismissed the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff to prove that the funds for the purchase of the land were actually paid by his father. The Books Proof Act, 1891, because there was no attachment to a certificate or statement, the author of the account statement did not even enter the witness room to prove that neither record was recorded. Nor was any bank-related evidence presented. The letter relied on by the plaintiff who did not have any person's signature and the letter's author did not enter the witness box to prove that he too It was not called to prove it. The issuance of the letter was not directly relied upon by the two courts on such statements of accounts and the letter that its contradictory results also showed that the defendant had sufficient evidence through the documentary evidence of the property in dispute. Supported to the extent that the contents of the anonymous transaction were not proven on the record nor did any misunderstanding arise. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Thana Bula Khan lawyer