versus
Section 13 and 30 Income Tax Ordinance (XLEX of 2001), Section 221 Income Tax Ordinance, Correction of collision in addition to error under section 13 of 1979 while it was increased under Section 30 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 , This issue was not verified in any way. Another notice was needed to counter the increase under section 30 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, following the SC's response to the Issue Counsel Notice under section 13 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, or to assess the income Receiving income was not section 13. The Tax Ordinance, 1979 and the Assessing Officer contended that the tax imposed on it under this rule was otherwise assessed by the Assessing Officer and thereby increased the income under section 30 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Has never been contested. After receiving the reply of the Assessing Officer, another notice was sought after awaiting his response against this proposed increase under Section 13 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. This order came as a surprise. Estimates of Revenue Other Earnings from Other Sources There were separate charging provisions with separate paragraphs that would require confrontation before combining the principles of natural justice \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Makli lawyer