Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 156 (2) Definition of Evidence The protection of an investigation by an officer who is not authorized to investigate, was that the CIA staff had, in this case, Was arrested and investigated. Who had no authority to conduct conduct, the basis of this case was illegal and subsequent proceedings, including sentencing and sentencing, were illegal, Section 156 (2) of the Accuracy, CRPC did not authorize the investigation of an officer. Provided protection to investigations by source. The power of law under which the government issued a section ROS which was read with the law framed by the Supreme Court, the arrest and interrogation of CIA personnel, who were part of the police department, did not fail the case. Will If, based on proven evidence, it was proved by the prosecution that the drugs were found in the possession or possession of the accused, it cannot be claimed that they were acquitted because of deficiencies or incompetent investigations. Where an accused has been treated unfairly in his defense by an investigative agency, which can be treated as a basis for others to record the final verdict, but this charge itself There can be no basis for stopping the accused who was entitled to be acquitted. Section 2342, CRPC's statement alleges that it was biased by an investigation by the CIA police, both defense witnesses cannot be believed because they were ridiculed. Statement and such oral evidence was easy to obtain at any stage of the investigation and at trial famous high court advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer