Find a Lawyer

versus

Sections 34 (1) and 26 Section R247 (I) / 2004 Dated 5 5 2004 Extra tax reduction rate The dispute is whether the rate or additional tax was 2% at the relevant time, but then the tax rate was increased to 1%. has been done. , Assisi had the right to lower the rate, there was no dispute about taxation but it was assessed intentionally and intentionally to make the payment or the self-assessed amount of sales tax that buyers Was received from and needs to be submitted. Until the due date, the Assisi government had been guilty of illegally withholding the tax collected by the Assisi Government and, therefore, it had no right to pay additional tax at its expense as it would at the relevant time. Was present and did not have the option to change it by applying a lower tax rate. The Assessee has failed to pay the correct amount of tax as per the provisions of Section RO 247 (I) / 2004 dated 5 5 2004, it was not e. Was instructed to pay additional tax at the rate of 2% per month fixed under section 34 (1) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, as the order was amended at the relevant time the Tribunal accordingly \ r \ n advocate for immigration from Kundina lawyer