Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, the Grant Detective of the Further Investigation was arrested after approximately six years, after the alleged incident, and a person who for the first time as an eyewitness Was introduced and claimed to be a witness. The incident was shown to identify the accused in the identification parade, but the fact was that the accused was not identified by the complainant. The accused remained in custody for three and a half years without any special progress in his trial. ? The complainant was identified and appeared before the police for the first time in six years after the witnesses witnessed, the FIR also stated that no other person was present at the time of the incident. , Against which it was argued against rationality. The trial was presented under litigation, so Section 497 (2), CR PC and the accused were entitled to bail. The accused were admitted to bail, under the circumstances. inheritance advocates near Shamsabad lawyer