Find a Lawyer

MST. HUMAIRA ASIF versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION), LAHORE

Section 156 Constitutional Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/201/365/392 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Investigation of Constitutional Petition, Investigation into the Exchange of Senior Police Officers The case is being presented in a very transparent manner in a very transparent way to cover up the actual facts of the case, which the Supreme Court also praised in the Human Rights case record, which it also clearly disclosed. That the applicant's husband and others were guilty of murder of the excise inspector. And the head constable says that the investigation was not made on merit and that the version of the accused was not considered during the investigation, it was wrong and regarding the approval of an application preferred by the applicant for transfer. The record was unsure of the record. The matter of the inquiry was not valid even otherwise, when the trial was started, at such stage an application should be merely pendente and the evidence of the partial prosecution was filed by the trial court, was disputed. As a result of the filing of the report under Section 173, the accused was not harmed in any of the investigations, the PC Investigation made by the police in any illegal proceedings, the prosecution or any other constitution. It didn't hurt. Accordingly the application was dismissed immigration advocates email from Chakwal lawyer