Find a Lawyer

SABIR ALI WASEEM versus STATE

Section 302 (b), 353, 324, 225 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), defining the evidence by filing an FIR by 3/2 hours delayed the filing of information by the police authorities. Of me And after careful consideration and consultation, the prosecutor's story was suppressed by the prosecutor's original facts and manner in which the incident occurred. It did not prove that the complainant's evidence was exaggerated, improved and contradicted. Was full and the prosecution's witnesses were not affected. In relation to all these persons only the identity and identity test of the accused was necessary, but only one accused was put to such examination by the prosecution witness and did not present the three prosecution witnesses before the magistrate for the identification of the other accused. had gone. Police did not support the main aspect of the case in relation to the incident information to the state when the prosecutor's witness lied to himself when witnesses did not have the opportunity to see the faces of the culprits. There was no weight otherwise, proof of identity could not be the basis for a conviction, being a disputed piece of evidence. The evidence was denied. The accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances list of advocates from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer