SYED SIRAJ HASSAN versus MUHAMMAD TAHIR
Appeals against the key points involved in sections 245 and 417 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), sections 409, 420, 468 and 471 show that this question has been crossed a cross, it is said that the respondent Has been acquired by. Otherwise it was in the name of the appellant's firm. And then it was said that he made the same deposit / deposit in his personal account, in which the active part of the trial court's bank officer duty was widely discussed, which is not the case. It would have been done by him. He was remanded to the trial court for dismissing the points contained in it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Depal Pur lawyer
