Find a Lawyer

ZAHID ULLAH versus QAYYUM KHAN

Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2) against the victorious prosecution failed to prove their case against the respondents / accused beyond any reasonable doubt and the trial court Had valid reasons for approving the search. The defendant in the standard and role wanted to be bad in favor of the prosecution's evidence so that the defendant's conviction of the ocular account could not be relied upon and it was doubtful whether witnesses saw the incident or whether there was any doubt about the incident. The victim, who was lost in the crash, lost his life and the complainant, but not through proven evidence by the prosecution that no firm was available to support ocular evidence, the prosecution's motive, medical evidence, Could seek help from the retriever and the fugitive, but every piece of evidence was poor and, failing in intrinsic value, the school Unable to rely on support for the R version, which itself was defective, the latter could not reinforce another piece of evidence. The trigger was a two-edged sword and could be cut both ways. And both sides had deep root strikes and even had disputes over landed property, otherwise the evidence on record was not credible and credible, only the fact that the accused was a fugitive, the defects and weaknesses in the prosecution case. Cannot be cited as the best evidence of its escape, nor can the trial court The evidence of this allegation was attended by every aspect of the case in its detailed and reasonable decision. Answering, leaving no room for further scrutiny best law firms from Sadiqabad lawyer