Find a Lawyer

MCC RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Second Schedule Income Tax Ordinance (1979), Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 246 and 247 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) of Complainant / Reviewer The exemption was planned in Gift District of Chaghe District, Balochistan Province, which is a tribal area and the production / commercial activities in the area of the project are not responsible for the provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, while the government is deducting Pakistan. Is. Receiving tax as export tax income tax under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was illegal, correcting the opinion from Member Income Tax, Central Board of Revenue in view of the provisions of Articles 246 and 247 of the Constitution Complainant / Reviewer. It was confirmed and also prayed that the Central Board of Revenue be instructed not to deduct any tax from export of goods for sale and to refund the tax already deducted. No response from source but multiple reminders. The Government of the People's Republic of China was owned by the Government of China and had no investment from China, which was involved in an important project that would benefit the country's economy. The negligence and delay led to serious misconduct, but someone else expressed negligence and unreasonable behavior with the CBR member who was asked to file a reply by the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax who had no paper. And all the information about the case was related to the member who was obliged to respond but was avoided. Such negligence and disrespect and behavior have diminished the confidence of investors, especially the foreign investors. , From which the country jobs for advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer