Find a Lawyer

ALI KHAN KHOSO versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (b) and 10 (7) Guarantee, the grant of age of the accused due to delay in request of his Was pressed on. At the end of the trial under section 10 (7) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, as it was stated that he was a child, as defined in Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 and That, despite the passage of more than a year, the trial was not over and that the accused's dismissal certificate was not responsible for the delay, indicating that his second time at the commission of the crime. Years and according to the Medical Board, the accused was between 17 and 18 years, the circumstances were a child as described in Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice, System Ordinance, 2000 He was and under section 10 (7) of the said ordinance, he is entitled to bail as a child if he has been in custody for more than a year. And the trial was not on record to conclude that the accused was a former convict or delayed by him. Nothing was on the record to show that the accused's crime was serious, disgusting, ridiculous, brutal, sensational or that he was accused of shocking public morals. Accepted bail in the circumstances famous lower court advocate from Ranipur lawyer