Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 1320/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 23RD APRIL, 2007. versus I.T.A. NO. 1320/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 23RD APRIL, 2007.

Sections 156, 62/65 and 13 (1) (a) of the error correction officer, upon seeing that the order of the appellate tribunal on the basis of the application was discussed and the correction application was rejected. And the matter cannot be rectified. The Assisting Officer's Level Initiating the order dismissed by the Appellate Authority with the observations that it asserts that the object taken by the review was rejected without valid justification which can be confirmed by the It was the authority that passed the final order, nor did the lower authority's actual dispute application point out that any legal case involving a record cannot be taken down because all errors, if any, If any, there was no justification for resolving the matter as it was subject to appeals. Appeal from de novo deliberations departments allowed and the appellate tribunal to look after the correctional request by donors. immigration advocates email from Dhirkot lawyer