Find a Lawyer

QASIM ALI versus STATE

Section 302 (b) after the discovery of the body of the victim, the definition of evidence was lodged an FIR. The incident was an unexpected incident and the entire trial case was centered on the evidence. There was a demand for a refund for the victim. For the purpose of sending him abroad for employment, the co-accused said that the Seed movie, provoked by the complainant, was rightly rejected by the trial court's prosecution, the prosecution's witnesses admitted Was that they were residents of a place 70/80 miles away. The explanation provided for the presence of the accused in the victim's house on the day of the incident, was neither worthwhile nor proved on record; the whole story of the prosecution was present from the trial to the extent of the prosecution, There was intense suspicion about this. The witnesses at the date of the incident did not have the last evidence presented by the prosecution witnesses. The credible neither reliable crime weapon was stolen, they were recovered from the open ground of the accused after more than three months, witnesses said That there was a police constable and investigating officer in the recovery, among other weaknesses in the recovery process, it was ignored in section 103, the CRPC, which made the recovery of the crime weapon extremely suspicious and Evidence of recovery, evidence of recovery, are only valuable, even to themselves, Mjrmyt not give evidence of the accused in the case of rum. The defendant's trial was the same as the trial, the trial court failed to appreciate property advocates from Qasba Gujrat lawyer