Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DAIEM SHATTARI versus STATE

The repeal of sections 737373 and 1 561 of the FIR was not independently exercised under the internal jurisdiction of the High Court Judicial Officer and he failed to exercise his discretion in any legal matter and while handling the case. The judicial officer's testimony must be self-explanatory. The reasons for justifying its conclusion were not enough to justify the case, simply stating that he had gone through the entire record and found that no such incident had occurred. To reach its conclusion, after discussing the circumstances and circumstances of his knowledge during the trial, he must give a reasonable reason, no doubt that Section 7373 Cr, CRPC Under the FIR, the order of cancellation was an administrative order, but nevertheless, in exercising its jurisdiction under this section, the relevant Judicial Officer was required to express his opinion that while doing so, he acted as a court. And he should have explained his own opinion instead of agreeing with the investigating officer on his brief confusing report. The judicial officer for one month, after the approval of the disputed order, did not allow any police officer to go beyond his jurisdiction over any dispute in the previous litigation; and the judicial officer, even the administration. To act in accordance with the wishes of a particular party, the High Court, in exercising its discretionary powers under Section 6161A, sets aside the CCPC's order and may, by any other district judge, Remand for re-examination of h famous high court advocate from Darya Khan lawyer