SAJID HUSSAIN versus STATE
Sections 302, 337a (ii) and 337f (ii) and (ii), l (ii) of testimony were of two versions of the case. Two injured accused were prosecuted, seven hours after the trial of three. Earlier, a medical examination was conducted in connection with the firearm injury to the two injured accused. The court did not believe the story of the abduction of the deceased from his home to the accused's tube well, which the trial court observed. Gone, it seems that only five properties taken from this place have been match. With the suspect's carbine, while the remaining ten crimes were never met by the co-accused's firearm, that would mean that the complaining party had fired another, resulting in the injuries to two of the accused. In my statement under section 2, 2, the possibility of the version of the accused in questioning the CCP cannot be denied. This was not the case where it could be said that the accused had exceeded his defense. The E-trial court did not convict the accused under section 2302 (b), PPC and the prosecution, and the complainant did not file any appeal against his verdict, stating that the accused had his own The defense was not exceeded, the appeal filed by him was accepted and sentenced. He was convicted by the trial court, the other accused had already faced one year and ten months imprisonment, conviction and punishment that had already passed through them, to complete the pursuit of justice. Was considered sufficient for
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Dina lawyer