MESSRS J.K. BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 10, 66 and 34A Section RO 308 (I) / 2000 Dated 6 6 2000 Formation of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) of the surplus amount forwarded or refunded Claiming to be refunded Annual penalty and additional tax exemption on sales tax was paid for sale of old vehicles on audit object after receiving exemption under Section RO308 (I) / 2000, after which the High Court demanded a refund. Based on decision In the decision that the department was not taxable on old vehicles, it was claimed that tax was voluntarily filed to avail the Amnesty scheme, in some other cases following the decisions of the High Court and the Appellate Tribunal. Did not automatically authorize the complainant to refund the sale. Taxes are voluntarily deposited and such refund can be made only on the basis of the original order or on the order of appeal. Adherence to the principles of the Supreme Court decision and may be payable, however, would be subject to the settlement of the showcase notice; corruption was established in non-compliance with the High Court's decision, and the Federal Tax Ombudsman deputy The collector recommended to expedite the process initiated by the showcase notice and finalize the claim for refund / refund of the deposit as sales tax. r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Hala lawyer