Find a Lawyer

JAVAID ALI versus STATE

Claims 2, 302, 44 379, re 447 and ?99 of the provisions were a case of prompt filing and the names of the accused and the role they played in the weapons of the crime were mentioned, The defendant, who killed four people, had no right to self-defense. More than 60 people were injured in the death toll from four firearms, sharp weapons and two weapons. And they were consistent with the number of accused policemen, even though the nine accused were innocent, but after recording evidence of seven prosecution witnesses, the trial court also called for the nine suspected accused, according to the investigating agencies' opinion. Was not bound, but that decision was to be made on the basis of the evidence brought to them by the two witnesses, although they were real brothers, but they did not have any hostility or ill-will towards the accused, except for some case which was pending and the complaint was made. In the favor of the contributing party, both the prosecution's witnesses were fully acquainted. The presence of one of the witnesses who transported the injured person to the hospital in a backdrop of prosecution cannot be doubted on the occasion that it was submitted through the Ocular account that the two witnesses of the prosecution believed. In a murder case, it can be based on the sole statement of a witness if the court is satisfied that he is reliable. The incident was a matter of illegal assembly. The defendants, during their legal proceedings against their common cause, Committed the brutal murder of four persons in order to seize upon the land which the legal worker Was referred to the complainant via hand immigration advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer