Find a Lawyer

QAISER SHEHZAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 66 (1) (c) and 13 (1) (d) Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), Section 2 (3), in some cases, to obtain a valid assessment threshold. The instructions for were kept separate. Under section 13 (1) (d) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, evidence of increase in shop ownership and business was also put aside which order of review on record was not available. And in the acknowledgment of receipt of the demand, the notice was actually filed in the notice to the record recorder's instructions that there was no record in the regular demand and receipt register stating that the DCR numbers were given. The order was admittedly not in the circle DCR Assisi has said that the review has not been reviewed Yop was activated and there was no legal basis for recovery notices asaysng officer claimed that ignorance was not due to earlier reviews Order record. It is stated that no such diagnostic order was available on record. Deputy Qasim also admitted in writing that when the recordkeeper asked to do so, he himself demanded the notice (his services). In the confessional). No record was actually made in the name of a reviewer to tamper with the record, and unsuccessful attempts were made to indicate that a re-review order was approved before the limit expired. If I had not passed such an order, then the notice issued on the recovery tax claim had no legal basis. famous supreme court advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer