Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ KHAN versus SHAIKH RAIS

Evidence of the witnesses examined by the prosecution was not discussed in support of this case in an appeal against the Section 417 (2A) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (iii), 504/34 evil magistrate. Identity pricing magistrates were unsuccessful. In order to perform its duties under section 67367, the PC Trial Court had to examine the entire evidence, after recording and hearing the evidence of the parties, and then either convict or acquit the accused. That is, medical evidence was corroborated in nature only if the medical evidence was in error, compared to other evidence on the record relied upon, then such other conviction could also be punished, because The medical evidence was not sufficient to prove the injuries on the injured person alone, the magistrate wrote on the record of the case. All evidence of the prosecution does not refrain from discussing. If the defense evidence is relied upon, detailed reasons should also be recorded for the exclusion of the evidence presented by the prosecutor, making the unwarranted decision. The appeal for misconduct, non-use of intelligence and arbitration was granted and the unanimous verdict was set aside and the case was remanded in the trial court with remand. Rehearse the parties together with the medical evidence to evaluate the entire evidence and decide the case, especially given the law of the case that the medical evidence will be valid only in nature and if the ocular evidence is presented. shall be. On the record of this case, impressed with the trust, the medical evidence whatever it was famous supreme court advocate from Haripur lawyer