Find a Lawyer

MUBASHAR NADEEM versus STATE

The grant of the accused was not designated in Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 396 and 412 bail, the FIR, which, on the next day, involved the murder of the complainant's brother. Was filed against. , A supplementary statement was recorded in which he named the accused and others who had killed his brother based on information received from the prosecution's witnesses, saying that the witnesses did not report the matter to the complainant, According to the contents of the FIR, the complainant was following the victim at some distance and he arrived on the spot immediately after the prosecution version after the incident in the FIR: as well as in the supplementary statement, in the supplementary statement. It was also not mentioned why the accused had caused it. According to Code of Conduct, 1898, there is no provision for recording any additional statement, even the other, but it had no identifiable value and could not be equivalent to an FIR. No weapons were recovered from the accused during the investigation. The wind, which had been behind bars for the past eleven months and did not require police to investigate, would not work. Any useful purpose and without trial is equivalent to punishing him. After the accused has been granted bail, the accused was entitled to the same privileges as per the principle of consistency; the accused was admitted to bail. , Under the circumstances power of attorney advocate Morgah lawyer