Find a Lawyer

KHALID HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ZAHID ALIAS AJJI

Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 417, the death of the victim was the reason for the appellant's co-accused against the injuries sustained by the respondent / accused, which was the role of the 7th Rifle Prosecution. Firing aerial from his version. It was said that the recovery of the rifle from the capture of the accused was not hurt by the respondents / accused on the victim's body, there was no benefit of the prosecution as the rifle was not recovered from the vacant It could be countered with. The trial court correctly ruled that the prosecution had thrown a wide net so that the maximum number of accused could be involved. The trial court rightly denied the ocular account presented by the witnesses. To the extent that medical evidence supports the ocular account of the co-accused, the accused was unrelated but was incompatible with the trial court's reasoning for not reading the evidence or detecting the error. There was no reason to disagree with the conclusions reached, it was alleged that he had been acquitted of all the charges, he was charged twice with innocence. advocate for immigration from Doltala lawyer