Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ versus STATE

The testimony of both the complainant and the prosecution of the testimony of Section 302 (b), however, maintained that the trial court had effectively fired on the victim, while the accused was accompanied only by the co-accused and Two co-accused have been reported. The trial court found it appropriate to rely on the same witnesses so that the accused could be convicted or sentenced who never fired at the victim or anyone else during the confession. At the same time, the trial court disclosed the witnesses to the extent of a co-accused whose role in the alleged incident was similar to that of the accused, but these witnesses relied, in part, on conviction by the trial court. Was. And the convicts, the comments made by various police officers during the investigation of the case, had a huge impact on the trial court. The trial court allegedly should have denied the involvement of the accused in the incident, saying that the police officers' opinion of the perpetrator of the crime is irrelevant and such an opinion is not the sole basis for the conviction of the co-accused. Can be made which will allow for appeal. Through the trial court, the accused was convicted and the sentence was set aside, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt, he was acquitted and ordered to be released. property advocates from Bahawalpur lawyer