Find a Lawyer

PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATES, GUJRAT versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 170, 177, 114 (1) and 120 (1) of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) of the amount under section 114 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Refund banned. In relation to such return it was deemed to have been finalized under clause 120 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 the complainant / reviewer was entitled to a tax refund as a result of this assessment and the law. The request backed by was associated with a retraction. The department claimed that the complainant's case occurred under the parameters set for selection for audit under section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 as the claim for withdrawal was exceeded by Rs 100,000 and for the audit case. The refund could not be issued due to selection. If the reason for the audit is finalized after the audit has been finalized, more than one lakh refunds were claimed in the advertisement. In principle, the application was made under section 1770 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. There was no reason for the complainant / reviewer to stop the withdrawal by the donors and failure to issue a refund was a process of corruption. However, any claim for payment / deduction has yet to be verified, it can be verified immediately before the return is issued by the Federal Tax Ombudsman. The refund will be issued for the tax year 2003 and if it is confirmed then the tax payment / deduction is required, it should be done fast \ r \ n online advocate from Karak lawyer