Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AASIM versus STATE

Testimony of Articles 302 (b), 201 and 364 Evidence of doubt The benefit of the suspect was the real maternal uncle of the two witnesses of the extra-judicial confession, while the second was his friend's alleged confession, which was a very weak type of evidence. And the evidence was inconclusive, which led to the identification of the deceased's dead body / skeleton; eleven months after the accused had identified that the body of the body was in an advanced state after that. It was impossible to identify the deceased's body after eleven months of injury, resulting in the victim's head being identified with a sharp weapon. It was as if the identity card, two checks, one watch, etc. were recovered on the basis of the identification of one of the accused in connection with the articles, none of the accused mentioned in the FIR is of such stupid type. He will continue to say articles for a year-long saying that there was no benefit for the rehabilitation professionals Acquisition had no motive against the accused complainant at all stages, not changing his version of the accused. The accused was given the suspects, saying that the benefit of the suspect against the accused was given to the accused. Were kept apart, the accused was acquitted and released. property advocates from Alipur lawyer