Find a Lawyer

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, WASA versus INAYAT ULLAH THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

Section 44 Town Improvement Act (IV of 1922), Sections 58, 59 (a) and 60 Lahore Development Authority Act, XXXXX of 1975, Section 48 (3) (ii) cannot be appealed for land and land. The acquisition was initiated under the provisions of the Town Development Authority, 1975, under the provisions of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, the decision of the references filed by the owners of the land was made by the Tribunal under Sections 58 and 60 of the Town Improvement Act, 1922, Which had the benefit of appeals against tribunal decisions by the agency. Land was acquired on the basis of section 48 (3) (ii) of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, despite the provision of sections 488 to 60 of the Town Environment under section 48 of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, the Town Environment Act, Despite the cancellation of 1922. The Act, 1922, continued to apply in connection with the acquisition made under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, under section 59 (a) of the Town Environment Act, 1922, appealed under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 18 ? 94 was not available against the decision of Tribunal Section 59 (a) of the Town Improvement Act, 1922, provided that the Tribunal (except for the purpose of Section 454 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894) would be considered as the President of the Court and the Tribunal. Judgment of section 454 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 would be considered as an application which sought appeal against the award and decree of the referee court and in this case the decision of the tribunals was not in favor of appeal. Express terms have to be honored by the Constitution and do not exist. Otherwise the first appeals, according to them, were incompatible arguments that the two issues were consolidated but the Tribunal wrote separate decisions. family advocate from Sarai Alamgir lawyer