MUHAMMAD SHAFA versus STATE
Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 109 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7, the FIR has not been claimed in the refusal of the accused so that it merely Is absent. The names of the accused in the FIR did not reflect any adverse effect on the prosecution, statements of the prosecution's witnesses were inconsistent and they supported the version of the telephone record of the department's telephone that was presented by the prosecution and the alleged The suspect was allegedly physically linked to the crime. After the assailant attacked Prima's house, the case with the fugitive accused was in the hands of the prosecution. The trial was started and a case was settled for evidence. The request for bail was rejected in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Dhatmal lawyer
