ZAHIDULLAH versus SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
R235 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition A acceptance of bid after completion of auction proceedings Auction lease effect on May 15, 2006, Applicant highest bid of Rs 1.5 lakh Was offered and accepted. A fourth auction amount was submitted by the auction committee at the auction hall, the respondent was present at the auction and also signed the auction's terms and conditions before the auction even though the auction ended. No bid offered. , Respondents submitted a video request of Rs. 20 million which was rejected by the licensing authority which was not under the rules. Appeal amendment was dismissed, however it was allowed and the Punjab mining concession rules. A directive was issued for the re-auction of Validity Rule 235 (2), 2002, which dealt with the revision authority provided that the rule for auction or auction examination of any order was attracted only to the present or the auction. In cases, the dent had identified any error or invalidity in the auction proceedings, or the applicant's life Any breach or violation of the rules was accepted on the grounds that it was inevitable that the defendant could not take part in the auction process. On the day of the auction it was neither disclosed before any relevant authority nor raised before the licensing authority or the appellate authority; such excuse was not considered invalid or illegal by the petitioner or the licensing authority. can go. According to the law and the rules, he could not remain so
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer