NASEER AHMED versus JUDGE ANTI-TERORRISM COURT-III, LAHORE
Article 6 (1) (g) (m) and (n) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition has set aside the order of the Special Court FIR, alleging that the applicant / accused had filed tires. Road blocked by When the police party tried to remove obstacles to open the road, stones were also fired on the police party besides firing in the air and some of the injured persons have no medical information. No recovery was obtained from any stone / brick, or any burned vehicles or tires. No statement of any person has been recorded by the public from which this road has been blocked and anyone has suffered due to this act of the accused. The special court's jurisdiction can be determined based on the FIR and other material presented by the prosecutor at the time of the filing of the case, in which case the investigation was alleged to be completed, only two days after the incident. The incident was recorded and a delay of two days was also encountered. The special order of the Special Court regarding the killings was set aside by the police and the police was directed by the High Court to present the challan of the matter to the general criminal court. Of authorized jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kharian lawyer