Find a Lawyer

NASEEM KHAN versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), THATTA

Sections 3, 6 and 9 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 41 and 2 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 164 ?? Termination of allotment of land allotted to each allottee, 2 bailiffs allowed. The limit was exceeded and nothing was presented to prove that the allotment was given on the recommendations of the allotment committee and that allotment was allotted to the deserving persons, under the Sindh Gothabad (Housing Scheme) Act. Applicants purchased certain plots in violation of Section 3 of 1988. On the basis of oral statement and such entries were made in the District Officer (Revenue) of Form II, they canceled the allotment of plots except for the exercise of powers acquired under section 6 of the Sindh Gothabad (Housing Scheme) Act 1987. Was. The land allotment was made to the maximum extent of 2 knots, saying that the allotments were clearly given while ignoring the process of Sindh Goth Abad. The Housing Scheme) Act, 1987, in the case of a lower Revenue / Gothabad staff, whose allotment was canceled, was given false information for the allotment / grant and also violated the terms of the allotment and Was said to be in violation of the terms of the allotment. Applicable Qualifications of the Applicants, in the present case, being the clear purchaser of the plots in question, was entitled to the protection of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as Section 2 of the Transferred Property Act, 1882 From. It is said that nothing contained in the said Act shall be made, nor to any grant or transfer of land or any interest therein, either before or after the Government. best advocate from Umer Kot lawyer